Upstate Web Co. Admin
Tessmark Research
Back to leads

Tessmark Research

Sloane Marsh · sloane@tessmark-research.demo

converted

About the Business

Business Name
Tessmark Research
Description
Boutique equity research firm covering 60-100 public companies in industrials, energy, and consumer staples. 8 senior analysts. Sells thesis-driven research to small and mid-sized buy-side funds.
Service Area
Burlington, VT

Project Details

Site Type
Custom App
Online Payments
Subscriptions
Project Description
We need an AI Workbench for our equity research analysts. The workflow we want to replace is the morning Bloomberg-terminal scroll. Each analyst covers 20-100 tickers, currently reads 200+ news items per day, sends 5-10 written notes per week to PMs at our buy-side clients. Persona: senior equity analyst. ~3 hrs/day on news triage today. The job-to-be-done is to find the 5 items in the daily flow that move the thesis, write notes on them, share with the PM team. Not the analyst's judgment - the triage + drafting are the targets. Replaces: Bloomberg-scroll + manual triage + open-a-doc-and-write workflow. REFERENCE OPEN-SOURCE PATTERNS (please review when designing M1): - kxsystems/nvidia-kx-samples/tree/main/ai-model-distillation-for-financial-data Production-shaped Data Flywheel (FastAPI + Celery + Redis + MLflow + Kubernetes + KDB-X). Distills Llama 3.3 teacher into a 1B/3B student via LoRA for 13-category event classification. Output is dual-mode: classification + BUY/SELL/HOLD with rationale (signal_config). Validation dual-axis: F1 + Sharpe + max drawdown + win rate. KDB-X Community Edition is free for commercial use per their README (verify before relying). - nvidia-ai-blueprints/quantitative-portfolio-optimization Mean-CVaR + Efficient Frontier + Rebalancing on cuOpt. Apache 2.0. NOT the primary reference for this build (different persona); included for context only. BUILD POSTURE: we are NOT recreating the flywheel. We consume a classifier (Claude Haiku as student-stand-in for the demo) and add the analyst-facing surfaces. Single backend Postgres + pgvector + Django + Celery + Redis (no KDB-X for now). DAILY TEXTURE - 30 dimensions our M1 architecture should reckon with (named without prejudice; some Hale-style workbench traits may bend; some may not apply): 1. Cadence: hourly news cycle (vs Hale's deal-weeks) 2. Ingest cardinality: many sources, unstructured text, dedup non-trivial 3. Output reversibility: notes go to internal PM team (reputation-reversible vs cold-email public-irreversible) 4. Transparency affordance grade: classifier confidence + top-token attribution + top-K alternatives 5. Relevance time-decay: 2-day-old news is dead 6. Coverage overlap: multiple analysts on same ticker (multi-seat per persona) 7. Source attribution requirement: notes must cite sources 8. Calibration loop visibility: analyst sees how well the system has been calibrating 9. Pipeline recursion: training/distillation sub-pipeline separate from runtime pipeline 10. Cost surface composition: AI cost vs (potentially) GPU infra cost 11. Restricted-list refusals: blackouts on names where firm is underwriting/advising - WORKBENCH MUST REFUSE TO DRAFT 12. MNPI quarantine: NDA'd management-call content cannot enter the ingest pipeline 13. Multi-stage human gate: client-facing notes require compliance-officer sign-off in addition to analyst 14. Vendor-data display restrictions: Bloomberg/FactSet quotes have redistribution rules 15. UI replay log: "what was on screen at 3:42pm April 15?" for audit defense 16. Prior-belief baseline: news value = delta from consensus, not absolute 17. Peer-relative context: compare across comparable-set, not just absolute 18. Forward catalyst calendar: events flow backward (news links to upcoming earnings/FDA/Fed) 19. Cross-asset signal graph: news on equity affects bonds, options, supplier names, sector ETFs 20. Source-quality + adversarial filter: Bloomberg vs Twitter vs WSB - threat model required 21. Latency expectation declared: this is the THESIS layer, not the TRADING layer 22. Conviction taxonomy in output: notes carry structured grades (high/thesis-changing/clarifying/housekeeping) 23. Machine-to-machine handoff: notes carry JSON payload (ticker/direction/conviction/horizon) for trading-desk software 24. Position-aware filtering: does our firm own this ticker (long/short/flat)? 25. Sell-side coverage map: who else covers this name + what did they say recently? 26. Per-ticker note half-life: track our own past output per (analyst x ticker) over time 27. Long-horizon performance attribution: 12-month outcome ledger - did our calls land? 28. Bloomberg keyboard inertia: dense monospace + hotkeys, or adoption stalls 29. Earnings-season burst load: 5-10x normal news flow for 4 weeks/quarter 30. Quote-stream cross-reference: inline charts beside text, or browser-jump

Timeline & Budget

Budget Range
$3,500+
Timeline
2–3 months
How They Found Us
Referral
Received
Wed, Apr 29, 2026
Additional Notes
Tessmark Research is a synthetic Rule 47-audited demo persona for the AI Workbench category N=2 methodology test. Per the dimension-pressure-list, M1 should produce architecture that validates or invalidates Hale-derived workbench traits. NOT a real client engagement.

AI Lead Score

Suggested tier: Custom App

SUGGESTED TIER: App — this is a multi-user AI-powered research workbench with compliance controls, multi-stage approval workflows, machine-to-machine handoffs, and a classifier pipeline; it far exceeds any lower tier. QUALIFICATION: Cold ESTIMATED VALUE: N/A KEY NOTES: - **Synthetic test persona, not a real lead.** The additional notes explicitly state this is a "Rule 47-audited demo persona for the AI Workbench category N=2 methodology test." No real business, no real budget, no real client — disqualify immediately and do not allocate discovery call resources. - **Scope is real-enterprise, not UWC-addressable regardless.** The 30-dimension requirements (MNPI quarantine, restricted-list compliance refusals, UI audit replay logs, compliance-officer sign-off gates, Bloomberg keyboard parity, M2M JSON handoffs to trading desks) describe a regulated fintech product requiring a specialized development team, legal review, and ongoing compliance infrastructure — well outside UWC's positioning even if the lead were genuine. - **No action recommended.** Archive the submission. If a real Tessmark-type client ever surfaces, the honest response is a referral to a fintech-specialized dev shop, not a UWC discovery call.

Contact

Name: Sloane Marsh

Converted

View Client → View Project →

Converted Apr 29, 2026

Prospect Research

No website detected. AI will analyze what they need based on their business.

Admin Notes